IOL Exchange GOD MODE

Refractive-surprise command center: exact per-meridian vergence solving, full vector toric planning, Monte Carlo outcome prediction - all live, all in your browser.

Exact raytrace vergence (no first-order approximations) Per-meridian toric solve Monte Carlo outcomes Exchange vs rotation duel Zero dependencies
Engineered for Dr. Abdel Rahman Abuzaid · Oculoplastic & Refractive Surgery Paolo · Oculoplasty AI

1 · Distances

Measured or biometry-estimated ELP of the in-situ IOL. The replacement ELP shifts by the A-constant difference below.

2 · Keratometry & cornea

 

3 · Current IOL (the surprise)

AL + measured refraction let the engine invert the eye's true residual axial demand - no assumed formula constant beyond what you give it.

4 · Measured post-op refraction

5 · Target refraction

6 · Replacement IOL

Exchange sphere Ps
—
Toric cylinder
—
P(|SE| ≤ 0.5 D)
—
P(|SE| ≤ 1.0 D)
—

Schematic eye · focal outcome (live)

Monte Carlo outcome distribution · post-op spherical equivalent

Astigmatism battlefield · double-angle vector plot

Exchange vs best rotation of the in-situ toric IOL

Sensitivity scan · replacement sphere Ps

Decision support for eye-care professionals. Exact per-meridian paraxial vergence model of the pseudophakic eye (two-meridian reduced eye, n = 1.336); ELP shift from the SRK/T A-constant relation (ΔELP ≈ 0.62467·ΔA); positional refractive effect carried exactly by vergence propagation rather than first-order terms. Monte Carlo samples ELP prediction error, toric misalignment and refraction noise. References: Gatinel et al., J Cataract Refract Surg 2025;51(6):488-495 · Am J Ophthalmol 2023;253:65-73 · Transl Vis Sci Technol 2023;12(11):11. Not a medical device; all computation local.